32 Kan. App. 2d 927 - State v. Kackley’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · State v. Nunn · State v. Whitesell · In re the Protest of Smith · State v. Manning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[t]he rationale for admitting evidence of prior unrelated acts to show plan under K.S.A. 60-455 is that the method of committing the prior acts is so similar to that utilized in the case being tried that it is reasonable to conclude the same individual committed both acts. In such cases the evidence is admissible to show the plan or method of operation and conduct utilized by the defendant to accomplish the crimes or acts. [Citations omitted.]” Damewood, 245 Kan. at 682 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Prine
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.