Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 LAANN 103 - State v. Chenier

State v. Chenier’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
February 1910
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1910

3 state decisions

301880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We cannot sanction such a departure from ancient landmarks in criminal procedure. The prisoner must be arraigned and must, plead to the indictment before the case can be set down for trial or tried. It may be that, in this particular case, no prejudice”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.