Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 Md. App. 590 - Fidazzo v. State

32 Md. App. 590 - Fidazzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1986
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · United States v. Watson · 12 Md. App. 684 - Walker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that: [Although we give great weight to the findings of the hearing judge as to specific, first-level facts (such as the time that an interrogation began, whether a meal was or was not served, whether a telephone call was requested, etc.) we must make our own independent judgment as to what to make of those facts; we must, in making that independent judgment, resolve for ourselves the ultimate, second-level facts....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.