¶1held that replevin would not lie for an undivided interest in a chattel where the execution of the writ will operate to deprive a co-tenant whose title is undisputed of his right of possession.
¶2Judgment reversed, with costs of both courts.
32 Mich. 310
Decided June 18, 1875
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1875-06-18
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1919
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.