¶1The application to set aside the judgment and for leave to answer was addressed to the discretion of the court below. There is no pretence for saying that there was any abuse of discretion, and the order appealed from must be affirmed.
32 Minn. 312
Smith v. Harmon
Decided July 18, 1884
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1910
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1884-07-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →