Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 MINN 48 - Webb v. Michener

Webb v. Michener’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
February 1951
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1951

1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

2018841890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paine v. Sherwood · Cushing v. Seymour, Sabin & Co. · City of Saint Paul v. Laidler · Martin v. Pillsbury

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By the amendment of 1876 material changes were made in the statute in relation to the authentication of account-books. Section 71, c. 73, Gen. St. 1866, which required their verification by a clerk where the original entries were made by him, is repealed, and section 70, which previously provided for the suppletory oath of the party, is amended, so that he is now permitted to ‘prove’ that the charges are in the handwriting of a person authorized to make them, and that they are the original entries of goods sold, etc. It was not necessary, therefore, that Canfield should be called to testify as to the entries made by him and we think the evidence sufficient, in view of the circumstances, to make a prima facie case that the charges were original entries regularly made as the transactions occurred in the usual course of business. . . .. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.