Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 Mo. 276

Clark v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1862

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1862-03-15

<p>Practice, — Judgment affirmed for the reason that the appeal was frivolous.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1862-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1979

5 state decisions

10186218701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bates, Judge,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This suit, which is for a very small amount, originated in a justice’s court, where the defendant had judgment. It was carried to the St. Louis Law Commissioner’s Court, where the defendant again had judgment, and the plaintiff appealed to this court.

¶3The bill of exceptions shows some testimony given at the trial, but does not show that it was all the testimony given. It shows that the plaintiff objected to testimony given by the defendant, but does not show the grounds of objection. No exception was taken to the declarations of law given by the court. The appeal is frivolous.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.'
/32/mo/276 · .json · Public domain