¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2In declaring on a contract containing stipulations to be performed by the plaintiff precedent to the performance of the agreement of the defendant, the plaintiff must show the performance of such stipulations, or a sufficient excuse for their non-performance.
¶3The contract sued on in this case was made in Missouri in anticipation of an expedition to California in pursuit of gold. The stipulations on the part of plaifttiff and Brauchman, as shown by the petition, were “ to procure the necessary oxen and wagons, provisions, tools and clothing, and leather for shoes, on the trip and whilst in California — necessaries proper and suitable for the expedition both in going out and while remaining there ; ” in consideration of which the defendant was to go with the parties, aid them on the way, and serve them for three years,, and account to them for one half of all gold he should dig or discover during the time.
¶4The following is all that is in the petition affecting to show a compliance with the agreement on the plaintiff’s part:
“Plaintiff further states that he and said Brauchman, in the spring of said year 1849, started to California with teams, tvagons and provisions sufficient for the trip, taking defendant with them according to their said contract with him.”
¶5The breach of the defendant’s agreement is then averred and recovery asked. The defendant demurred to the petition, assigning among other causes of demurrer, the omission to aver the performance of the plaintiff’s part of the contract. *486The demurrer was sustained, and judgment given for the defendant.
¶6The demurrer was well taken. The liability of the defendant is dependent as well upon the furnishing of tools, clothing, and leather for shoes, as upon the furnishing of the oxen, wagon and provisions; and the plaintiff having omitted to show by his petition that he had furnished these, has failed to show any cause of action against the defendant.
¶7Let the judgment be affirmed.