Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 Mo. App. 177

Rimel v. Hays

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 29, 1888

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1888-10-29

<p>Practice: affirmance : case adjudged. The court holds (after a careful examination of the abstracts of record, and the briefs of counsel) that the case was, on the whole, retried by the circuit court in substantial conformity with the principles of the decision of the supreme court (reversing a former judgment in this case) in Rimel v. Hays, 83 Mo. 200. Also, that whatever error was committed by the court in overruling certain objections made by plaintiffs in error to evidence offered by defendant in error, was cured by instructions given at the former’s instance.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1897

1 state decisions

Relies on Rimel v. Hayes

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Aeeibmed · Decided 1888-10-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hall, J.

¶1— This case has been pending in the various courts of this state for many years. It has been once in the supreme court, where the judgment of the circuit court was reversed and the case remanded on account of certain errors. Rimel v. Hays, 83 Mo. 200.

¶2The abstract of the record is quite voluminous, and many questions are presented by counsel for plaintiffs in error for our consideration. After a careful examination of the abstracts of record and the briefs of counsel, we are satisfied, and content ourselves with so stating, *178that the case was, on the whole, retried by the circuit court in substantial conformity with the decision of the supreme court. We may, however, add that whatever error was committed by the court in overruling certain objections made by the plaintiffs in error to evidence offered by the defendant in error was cured by instructions given at the former’s instance.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

All concur.
/32/moapp/177 · .json · Public domain