Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 NJL 249 - Law v. Stokes

Law v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis

1867

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
5
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2002

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions

60186718701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dunning v. Roberts · Thurman v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A principal is bound by the acts of his agent within the authority he has actually given him, which includes not only the precise act which he expressly authorized him to do, but also whatever usually belong to the doing of it or is necessary to its performance.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all remittances on account, or in settlement of bills, must be made direct to the principal; salesman not authorized to collect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.