Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 N.J. Super. 178 - Pratico v. Rhodes

32 N.J. Super. 178 - Pratico v. Rhodes’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 1984

11 state decisions

601954196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Estate of Santa Perrone · State v. Morano · 120 Pa. Super. 59 - Rosen v. Superintendent of Police Le Strange · Spindler v. Universal Chain Corp. · People v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the Superior Court, Appellate Division, is empowered to review the evidence relating to facts in cases, particularly' where controversial issues are essentially factual, and make its own independent findings, the court is not disposed on appeal to overthrow conclusions of the trier of facts unless it is the court’s conviction that such conclusions are so manifestly unsupported by or discordant with competent, relevant and reasonably credible evidence as to offend the interest of justice. * * *””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Where money is earmarked and segregated as part of an illegal gambling operation it then constitutes a gambling device subject to seizure. (citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.