32 N.J. Super. 89 - State v. Riccardo’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2012
2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lowenstein · State v. Avery · Berry v. State · Saylors v. State Bank · State v. Vandenburg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The purpose of the statute was to discourage overdrafts and resulting bad banking (Saylors v. State Bank of Allen, 99 Kan. 515, 518 , 163 P. 454 ) to stop the practice of “check kiting,” and generally to avert the mischief of trade, commerce and banking which the circulation of worthless checks inflicts.’ State v. Avery, 111 Kan. 588 , 207 P. 838, 839 , 23 A. L. R. 453, at page 456 (Sup. Ct. 1922).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * while the mere fact that a check is given for a past consideration does not ipso facto negative the element of fraud, it is a controlling circumstance when no other element of fraud exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.