Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 N.M. 442 - In Re Fleming

In Re Fleming’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2002

6 state decisions

30192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The evidence does not permit us to accept respondent’s protestations of mere carelessness and of no wrongful intent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.