¶1 Motions for re-argument should be founded on papers showing clearly that some question decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, has been overlooked by the court; or that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision, to which the attention of the court was not drawn, through the neglect or inadvertence of counsel.
32 N.Y. 702
Mount v. . Mitchell
Decided June 5, 1865
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1865-06-05
<p>Motion for a re-argument.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1865-06-05
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 1969
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →