Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 279

Combs v. Combs

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1881

New York Supreme Court · decided 1881-10-15

The plaintiffs brought this action for the recovery of money only/ for use and occupation, in a Justices’ Court, and recovered. The defendant appealed to the County Court, where the judgment was modified so as to stand for eighty-seven dollars damages. The defendant then appealed to this court and the judgment was affirmed, the decision being silent as to costs. The plaintiff taxed them and the Special Term, on motion, struck them out.

Decided 1881-10-15

Hardin, J.:

¶1Section 3238 of the Code of Civil Procedure entitles the plaintiffs to the costs of the appeal to this court.

¶2That section declares the recovery of costs is regulated as follows:

“(1.) In an action specified in section 3228 of this act the respondent is entitled to costs upon the affirmance.”

¶3Turning back to section 3228 we find in subdivision i: “An ■action in which the complaint demands judgment for a sum of money only ” is specified.

¶4*280Such an action is this one, in which we pronounced a judgment of affirmance.

¶5The character of the action is distinctly stated in section 3228, and therefore the section in- terms applies to it, and the costs must be given, as expressly declared in section 3228.

¶6No award of them by the court was necessary. They follow the affirmance as a matter of statutory right. (Gray v. Hannah, 3 Abb. [N. S.], 183.) The question is not affected by subdivision 13 of section 3347 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶7We should reverse the order of the Special Term, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Smith, P. J., and Haight, J., concurred.

¶8Order appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

/32/nysupct/279 · .json · Public domain