32 Ohio App. 2d 139 - Brown v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably 457 F. Supp. 1146 - Cartledge v. Miller (1978), 454 F. Supp. 22 - Cody v. Riecker (1978)
3 federal appellate · 3 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schlaefer v. Schlaefer · Thiel v. Thiel · 22 Wis. 2d 382 - Ponath v. Hedrick · 104 N.J. Super. 280 - Essex Co. Welfare Bd. v. Philpott · Texas Baptist Children's Home of Round Rock v. Corbitt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of any person to any future payment under this subchapter shall not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity, and none of the moneys paid or payable or rights existing under this subchapter shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process, or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“An important, often the primary motivation for taking out disability insurance is protection of the family, not merely of its supporter. * * * Furthermore, the usual purpose of exemptions is to relieve the person exempted from the pressure of claims hostile to his dependents' essential needs as well as his own personal ones, not to relieve him of familial obligations and destroy what may be the family's last and only security, short of public relief. [at 185]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“request for alimony, different from a claim of a creditor, is unaffected by the exemption set forth in Section 407.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.