32 Ohio App. 2d 200 - Hirsch v. Hirsch’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 1977
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 130 Ohio St. 92 - Draher v. Walters · 154 Ohio St. 177 - Peters v. Moore · Porter v. Fenner · 49 Ohio App. 490 - Koeninger v. Toledo Trust Co. · Hecker v. Schuler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A will contest action, otherwise rightly brought within the meaning of R. C. 2741.09, will not fail under R. C. 2741.02 for the sole reason that persons named testamentary trustees in the will, but who have not been appointed to such capacity within the period of six months following probate, are not joined as parties in that capacity, where such persons are parties in their capacity of co-executors, having been so named in the will and appointed by the probate court, and where all the beneficiaries of the testamentary trust have been timely made parties to the action.” Id. at 210 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.