32 Ohio App. 2d 218 - State v. Kristanoff’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““* * * R.C. 2937.02. Subdivision (C) of that section requires the court to advise the accused of the effect of pleas of guilty, not guilty and no contest. To sustain the validity of a plea of no contest and the concomitant waiver of constitutional rights, the record must affirmatively demonstrate that the court discharged the mandatory duties imposed by R.C. 2937.02. Cleveland v. Whipkey (1972), 29 Ohio App. 2d 79 [ 58 O.O.2d 86 ].” (R.C. 2937.02 now superseded by Crim. R. 5 and 11.) (Emphasis added.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 11 Ohio App. 3d 43 - City of Toledo v. Chiaverini

2. ““* * * [T]he plea of ‘no contest’ is not synonymous with the ancient plea of ‘nolo contendere’ in that the plea of ‘nolo con-tendere’ is an implied admission of guilt and, for the purpose of the case in which it is entered, is equivalent to a plea of guilty, whereas, in a plea of no contest, the court must go further and make a finding of guilty or not guilty from the ‘explanation of circumstances.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 11 Ohio App. 3d 43 - City of Toledo v. Chiaverini