Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 OHIOST3D 344 - Smith v. Padgett

Smith v. Padgett’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

173
cited by 173 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

165 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 173 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co. (1992), Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion) (2014)

165 state decisions

53019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pugh v. Holmes · 143 Ohio St. 541 - Bishop v. East Ohio Gas Co. · Vardeman v. Llewellyn · 7 Ohio App. 3d 122 - Berlinger v. Suburban Apartment Management Co. · 17 Ohio App. 3d 79 - Albreqt v. Chen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 173 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] landlord who wrongfully withholds a portion of a tenant's security deposit is liable for damages equal to twice the amount wrongfully withheld and for reasonable attorney fees.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Ohio law has long recognized that an owner of either real or personal property is, by virtue of such ownership, competent to testify as to the market value of the property.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “within thirty days after termination of the rental agreement and delivery of possession.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.