Arthur v. Coyne’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2003 · most notably Frandson v. Casey (1955), Burt v. Steigleder (1928)
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Towsley · Shepley v. Cowan · Moore v. Robbins · Marquez v. Frisbie · Beard v. Federy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• “Under the doctrine of relation, when the patent issued to defendant, it related back and took effect as of the date of the application for and scheduling of the lot, to wit, July 10, 1902. Shepley v. Cowan, 91 U. S. 330 [ 23 L. Ed. 424 ]; Beard v. Federy, 3 Wall. 478 [ 18 L. Ed. 88 ],” and other cases cited.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Kennedy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.