Flanders v. Aumack’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Vien-Phuong Thi Ho v. ReconTrust Co. (2016), McQueeney v. Toomey (1907)
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co. · Ogle v. Koerner · Hervey v. Krost · Phyfe v. Riley · Watson v. Cornell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘ ‘ The statute has provided for redemption by but two classes of persons, — the judgment debtor and his successor in interest, and creditors having liens, etc. A redemption by the latter class is with a purpose of securing a sheriff’s deed in pursuance of the sale, and a redemption by the former is inimical to the sale, and puts an end to it; and the effect cannot be different whether the judgment debtor or his successor in interest redeem.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.