State v. Yancey’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1981
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) A person commits the crime of possession of gambling records in the second degree if, with knowledge of the contents thereof, he possesses any writing, paper, instrument or article: "(a) Of a kind commonly used in the operation or promotion of a bookmaking scheme or enterprise; or "(b) Of a kind commonly used in the operation, promotion or playing of a lottery or numbers scheme or enterprise."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"This requirement of knowledge alleviates any vagueness problem since only a person who the state shows had knowledge that the possessed object is of a type commonly used in a gambling scheme can be convicted. * * *" 32 Or. App. at 480 , 574 P.2d 358 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.