People v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2026
1 district · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Moran v. Burbine · Oregon v. Elstad · North Carolina v. Butler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“fully aware of the nature of the right to remain silent ... and the consequences of abandoning that right,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[j]ust as a trial court's application of an erroneous legal standard in resolving a suppression motion is subject to correction on appeal, so also is an ultimate legal conclusion of constitutional law that is inconsistent with or unsupported by evidentiary findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Humphrey“[w]e will not substitute our own judgment for that of the trial court unless the trial court's findings are clearly erroneous or not supported by the record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.