People v. Martinez’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Manson v. Brathwaite · Maryland v. Dyson · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Vincent Joseph SPOTO · People v. Czemerynski
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is uncertain whether Apprendi compels the conclusion that any such fact that may increase the maximum penalty ipso facto becomes an essential element of that offense. Given this uncertainty, we conclude that [Henderson ] remains disposi-tive of the merger issue before us.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Dunlap · Brown v. State“blurred the distinction between elements of a crime and penalty enhancers,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.