Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 S.C.L. 153

Harrison v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1846

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1846-12-15

Tried before Mr. Justice Frost, at Kershaw, Fail Term, 1846. The defendants were the sureties of one Lee, in a recognizance (dated 27th Dec. 1844,) to appear and answer to a charge of gaming. The principal was convicted, and never appeared to receive sentence, but escaped to Georgia. A sci.fa. having been duly served on the defendants, they shewed for cause against the estreat of the recognizance, that the same was irregularly taken and void.

Decided 1846-12-15

Withers J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶2This Court see no reason which would warrant them in reversing the decision on the circuit. Besides the ground particularly relied upon by the Judge below, it appears that R. L. Wilson, who certified the recognizances, was a magistrate ex officio, in his capacity of Recorder and Marshal of the town of Camden by the terms of the Act of Assembly of Dec. 1830 and thereby invested with all the powers of a magistrate, except for the trial of small and mean causes. In addition to this, it was abundantly proved, that he had often exercised the office of magistrate in negro trials and otherwise, and believed he had taken the oath of a magistrate, after his election as Ordinary. When to this we add that it was by no means certain that he was functus officio as a magistrate proper, we conclude that he was sufficiently authorized to take and certify the recognizances of defendants: or at least the onus probandi was thrown upon the appellants.

¶3The motion is dismissed.

/32/scl/153 · .json · Public domain