Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 667 So. 2d 1242 - Ballenger v. State · Brown v. State · 682 So. 2d 340 - Brown v. State · 729 So. 2d 203 - Burns v. State · 784 So. 2d 186 - Austin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any testimony of [Tillman] which you find to be uncorroborated by other evidence should be viewed with great caution and suspicion[.]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although granting a cautionary instruction regarding the testimony of an accomplice is within the trial judge's discretion, such an instruction is required when the accomplice's testimony is the sole basis for the conviction, and the defendant's guilt is not clearly proven.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he jury is to regard the testimony of co-conspirators with great caution and suspicion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.