Eason v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Edwards v. Booker · 962 So. 2d 78 - Siggers v. Epps · 915 So. 2d 508 - Guy v. State · 793 So. 2d 675 - Kidd v. State · Thompson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Two (2) or more offenses ... may be charged in the same indictment with a separate count for each offense if: (a) the offenses are based on the same act or transaction.... [[Image here]] (3) When a defendant is convicted of two (2) or more offenses charged in separate counts of an indictment, the court shall impose separate sentences for each such conviction. [[Image here]] (5) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed ... to prohibit the court from exercising its discretion to impose such sentences to run either concurrently with or consecutively to each other or any other sentence or sentences previously imposed upon the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.