Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 So. 3d 718

Nichols v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-04-07

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 2017

4 state decisions

Relies on 2 So. 3d 191 - State v. Rabedeau

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 The appellant challenges the sentences entered upon his revocation of probation. The state correctly concedes that, because his original sentences were concurrent, the appellant is entitled to credit for time served on each of the consecutive sentences to which he was resentenced. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court to award credit for time served to each sentence. See State v. Rabedeau, 2 So.3d 191, 193 (Fla.2009).

¶2 REVERSED and REMANDED.

HAWKES, C.J., ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
/32/so3d/718 · .json · Public domain