Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 S.W.3d 623

State v. Echols

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-11-07

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2007

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-11-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellant Echols appeals from his conviction for first-degree murder. In his sole point on appeal, Echols argues that because the court deleted a portion of his videotaped confession, the jury was unable to assess his mental state and thus he was denied his constitutional rights to due process and to present a defense. Affirmed, Rule 30.25(b).

/32/sw3d/623 · .json · Public domain