Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

32 S.W.3d 678

T.E.S. v. D.J.L.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-12-05

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2016

3 state decisions

Relies on T.E.S. v. D.J.L.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HOLLIGER, Judge,

¶1concurring.

¶2I concur in the result but write separately to emphasize the potential problems created when competing adoption petitions are not consolidated or the re*680spective parties do not obtain intervention in the competing actions. The reasons for my concern are more fully expressed in my concurrence to the companion decision handed down simultaneously In the Matter of K.W. and J.S., 32 S.W.3d 674.

/32/sw3d/678 · .json · Public domain