Tried below before Hon. T. S. Reese. Appellant was indicted for assault with intent to murder one Canuto Lerno with a bowie knife. His trial resulted in his conviction, with punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. On the night before the stabbing, appellant and Canuto Lerno had a difficulty over a game of monte. The parties were drinking, and continued drinking during the night.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1918
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
¶1
Appellant was convicted of an assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary, from which he appeals. There are but two questions to be considered.
¶2
1. The indictment charged an assault with intent to murder with a bowie knife. The State, over the objection of the defendant, proved that the assault and stabbing was committed with a butcher knife, and this is alleged as error. We do not think there was any variance or error. Penal Code, art. 501.
¶3
2. The court did not err in refusing the charge on drunkenness; first, because the evidence did not justify such a charge; and secondly, admitted that it did, still if appellant would have been guilty of murder had he been sober and had death resulted, the fact that he was temporarily insane from the recent use of intoxicating liquor, or so drunk as to be incapable of forming an intent, would not have reduced the offense lower than murder in the second degree. Evers’ case, 31 Texas Cr. Rep., 318. And the fact that the lowest punishment was in fact given super-cedes any failure of the court to charge that they should look to such drunkenness in mitigation of the penalty. The judgment is affirmed.
