Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 UTAH 62 - Cottrell v. Pickering

Cottrell v. Pickering’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2016

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

20190719101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sumner v. Seaton · Maye v. Tappan · Cronin v. Gore · Hall v. Kellogg · Iverson v. Swan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “{if there are any laches, they are to be imputed as much to one [party] as to the other'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.