32 Va. App. 744 - Cressell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dobbert v. Florida · United States v. Martinez-Salazar · Nebraska v. Wyoming · LeVasseur v. Commonwealth · Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Weinstein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not uncommon to discover during voir dire that prospective jurors have preconceived notions, opinions, or misconceptions about the criminal justice system, criminal trials and procedure, or about the particular case. Even though a prospective juror may hold preconceived views, opinions, or misconceptions, the test of impartiality is whether the venireperson can lay aside the preconceived views and render a verdict based solely on the law and evidence presented at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.