Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 Va. App. 775 - Wells v. Commonwealth

32 Va. App. 775 - Wells v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. California · Caminetti v. United States · Rock v. Arkansas · Johnson v. United States · Higginbotham v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Possession need not be actual, exclusive, or lengthy in order to support a conviction; instead, the statute criminalizes constructive or joint possession of illegal drugs of any duration. Constructive possession of illegal drugs may be proven by “ ‘evidence of acts, statements, or conduct of the accused or other facts or circumstances which tend to show that the [accused] was aware of both the presence and character of the substance and that it was subject to his dominion and control.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.