¶1 (concurring in the result) — Scanty as the evidence was as to the identity of the man who did the shooting, it seems to me that it was sufficient to require the case to be sent to the jury. Since it found the defendant (appellant) guilty, I think the judgment founded on the jury’s verdict must be affirmed.
32 Wash. 2d 278
201 P.2d 513
State v. Evans
Decided January 5, 1949
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1949-01-05
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1978
5 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1949-01-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →