32 Wash. App. 437 - State v. Beel’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 91 Wash. 2d 466 - State v. Foster · 93 Wash. 2d 510 - State v. Shipp · 95 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Jones · 73 Wash. 2d 660 - State v. Huson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Assault in the second degree. (1) Every person who, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree shall be guilty of assault in the second degree when he: " (a) With intent to injure, shall unlawfully administer to or cause to be taken by another, poison or any other destructive or noxious thing, or any drug or medicine the use of which is dangerous to life or health; or "(b) Shall knowingly inflict grievous bodily harm upon another with or without a weapon; or "(c) Shall knowingly assault another with a weapon or other instrument or thing likely to produce bodily harm; or " (d) Shall knowingly assault another with intent to commit a felony. "(2) Assault in the second degree is a class B felony."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Siverson“In State v. Collins, 55 Wn.2d 469 , 348 P.2d 214 (1960), the court held that where the negligent homicide statute is applicable, it supersedes the manslaughter statute. Expanding this, State v. Pyles, 9 Wn. App. 246 , 511 P.2d 1374 (1973), held that a prosecutor must charge negligent homicide in all cases where there is substantial evidence that death occurred as a proximate result of the operation of a motor vehicle . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.