32 Wash. App. 889 - Sofie v. Kane’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2014
3 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 75 Wash. 2d 456 - Kendrick v. Davis · 88 Wash. 2d 777 - Cascade Security Bank v. Butler · Raborn v. Hayton · 79 Wash. 2d 485 - Welling v. Mount Si Bowl, Inc. · 41 Wash. 2d 380 - Holohan v. Melville
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to terminate or cancel their contract, both Kane and the Robins [the vendor and the vendee] were required to give notice to subsequent vendees of whom they had actual knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Upon a valid declaration of forfeiture, the vendee must relinquish possession of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A grantor can convey no greater title or interest than he or she has in the property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.