32 Wis. 2d 195 - Simpson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
January 1977
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · District of Columbia v. Clawans · Hedger v. State · Schissler v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is the further rule that great liberty and latitude are allowed in the cross-examination of expert witnesses. . . . However, the applications of this rule are often directed to such matters as the education of the expert witness, his practical experience, the extent of his observation outside his own work, as well as other cognate matters bearing directly on his ability as an expert. Upon such examination, hypothetical questions may go outside the record for the purpose of testing the skill of the witness.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““ ‘. . . the degree and manner of cross-examination in criminal cases are matters lying largely in the discretion of the trial court.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.