Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 32 WIS2D 523 - Oseman v. State

Oseman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
5
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 85 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably 115 Wis. 2d 334 - State v. Pharr (1983), 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles (1982)

3 federal appellate · 85 state decisions

3701966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Cochran · United States v. Crosby · Hempton v. State · Parke v. State · Baker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny evidence that assists in getting at the truth of the issue . . . even though it is only a link in the chain of facts which must be proved to make the proposition at issue appear more or less probable.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Thus it becomes evident that a verdict is upset only when, in the discretion of the court, the court believes that in view of the proceedings as a whole, substantial rights of the complaining party have been affected. It is our belief that the substantial rights of the plaintiff in error were not affected and that no reasonable jury could have fairly come to any other decision. “For sec. 274.37, Stats., to intervene and save the verdict, there should be an overwhelming quantity of other evidence in the case. Bartz v. State (1938), 229 Wis. 522 , 282 N. W. 562 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““[Ujnless a newspaper article is so prejudicial as to influence the verdict of the jury, it is solely within the judge’s discretion as to whether a mistrial is in order.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.