32 Wis. 2d 79 - State v. Cathey’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably 162 Wis. 2d 940 - In Interest of JAL (1991), 57 Wis. 2d 543 - State v. Harper (1973)
2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Brown v. State · State v. Adams · People v. Schulman · Birmingham v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . on trial to the court the judge is presumed to know what testimony is competent and will disregard extraneous matter.” Gauthier v. State (1966), 28 Wis. 2d 412, 421 , 137 N. W. 2d 101 , and Birmingham, v. State (1938), 228 Wis. 448, 463 , 279 N. W. 16 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.