State v. Gula’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 811 (§ 201 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Kiffer · 52 Ala. App. 35 - Warren v. State · 272 So. 2d 473 - Freimuth v. State · Junghans v. Department of Human Resources of District of Columbia · Kreisher v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“nationwide effort to achieve uniformity between the drug laws of the various states and federal legislation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Priest v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.