Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 Ark. 253 - Smith v. Denton

Smith v. Denton’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
August 2025
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably AKA v. Jefferson Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. (2001), Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc. (1998)

33 state decisions

2201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Goss v. Lopez · Epperson v. Arkansas · Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing · Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz · Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the present case, UCA failed to adhere to its own expressly enunciated standards for ensuring procedural due process. The procedures provided by the university were not structurally flawed; in terms of actual compliance, however, the letter and spirit of procedural due process were violated. To protect due process, the courts, in matters pertaining to a governmental entity’s observance and implementation of self-prescribed procedures, must be particularly vigilant and must hold such entities to a strict adherence to both the letter and the spirit of their own rules and regulations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Officers and employees of the State of Arkansas are immune from liability and from suit, except to the extent that they may be covered by liability insurance, for damages for acts or omissions, other than malicious acts or omissions, occurring within the course and scope of their employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.