Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 F.2d 277 - Monroe v. United States

Monroe v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

320 F.2d 277 · 1963

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7607

Relies on Draper v. United States · Powers v. United States · United States v. Mont · Espinoza v. United States · Harvey Gene Fowler v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Haskell D. Scott v. United States of America, (Two Cases)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Narcotic Control Act of 1956, 26 U.S.C. § 7607 (1957), specifically provides that agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics are authorized to make arrests without warrants for violations of the narcotics laws where the violations are committed in their presence or where they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person arrested is in the process of committing an offense against the laws of the United States relating to narcotic drugs. Draper v. United States, (1959) 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 ; Espinoza v. United States, (5th Cir. 1960) 278 F.2d 802 .” (Emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.