Paddock v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
320 F.2d 624 · 1963
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Goldstein v. United States · Bush v. United States · Kraft v. United States · Billeci v. United States · Callahan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(t)o warrant a reversal because of the conduct of the trial judge in rebuking or punishing an attorney during the trial, it must appear that the conduct measured by the facts of the case presented together with the result of the trial, was clearly prejudicial to the rights of the party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.