Schilling v. A/S D/S Dannebrog’s Empirical Analysis
320 F.2d 628 · 1963
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 1996 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984), Cohen v. Savings Building & Loan Co. (1990)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swift & Co. Packers v. Compania Colombiana Del Caribe, S. A. · United States v. Carver · Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co. · Dannebrog v. Signal Oil & Gas Co. · United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Charterers will not suffer, nor permit to be continued, any lien or encumbrance incurred by them or their agents, which might have priority over the title and interest of the owners in the vessel.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““a. (1) Every lien against the property of a person obtained by attachment, judgment, levy, or other legal or equitable process or proceedings within four months before the filing of a petition initiating a proceeding under this Act by or against such person shall be deemed null and void (a) if at the time when such lien was obtained such person was insolvent or (b) if such lien was sought and permitted in fraud of the provisions of this Act ‡ * * »”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Neither do we think that a lien in favor of the charterer for amounts contracted by the owner to be paid for fuel on board at the time of redelivery would be excluded in a proper case by the 'Charterers will not suffer' provision of Clause 18 quoted above. For we agree with Judge John R. Brown that the usual prohibition of liens clause 'does not undertake to deal with the power of the owner himself to subject his vessel to maritime liens,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.