Studemeyer v. Macy’s Empirical Analysis
320 F.2d 797 · 1963
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
April 1973
most recently cited
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Zuckert · Studemeyer v. Macy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The case is remanded to the District Court with instructions ‘to hold a hearing and determine whether the petitioner, desiring the presence of witnesses at his hearing, either discharged his initial burden under the applicable regulations by making timely and sufficient attempt to obtain their presence or, under the circumstances and without fault of his own, was justified in failing to make such attempt, and, if so, whether proper and timely demand was made upon the Air Force so that it was required to produce such witnesses for cross-examination. Upon making such determination, the District Court shall thereupon enter such further order or judgment as may be appropriate.’ [Citation]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Studemeyer v. Macy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.