Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 F.3d 291 - In re Bank of New York Derivative Litigation

In re Bank of New York Derivative Litigation’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

5 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Comer v. Cisneros · United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc. · Abramson v. Pataki · Gallup v. Caldwell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) how long the applicant had notice of the interest before it made the motion to intervene; (2) prejudice to existing parties resulting from any delay; (3) prejudice to the applicant if the motion is denied; and (4) any unusual circumstances militating for or against a finding of timeliness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “prevent[] * * * courts from being used to litigate purchased grievances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.