Malave v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis
320 F.3d 321 · 2003
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (2012), Tabor v. Hilti, Inc. (2013)
7 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griggs v. Duke Power Co. · Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust · Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio · New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer · Robinson v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“decide what the most appropriate labor pool is and whether the expert's method utilized the best and most appropriate available labor pool information.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the applicant pool or the eligible labor pool.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“where 'figures for the general population might . . . accurately reflect the pool of qualified candidates,' . . . we have even permitted plaintiffs to rest their prima facie cases on such statistics as well.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.