Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 320 F.3d 346 - Davis v. Goord

Davis v. Goord’s Empirical Analysis

320 F.3d 346 · 2003

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
4
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 178 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Hemphill v. New York (2004), Tracy v. Freshwater (2010)

33 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions

840200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Wolff v. McDonnell · Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Crawford-El v. Britton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a similarly situated individual of ordinary firmness”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Courts properly approach prisoner retaliation claims 'with skepticism and particular care,' because 'virtually any adverse action taken by a prison official-even those otherwise not rising to the level of a constitutional violation-can be characterized as a constitutionally proscribed retaliatory act.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) that the speech or conduct at issue was protected, (2) that the defendant took adverse action against the plaintiff, and (3) that there was a causal connection between the protected speech 7 and the adverse action.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.