Jorgensen v. Cassiday’s Empirical Analysis
320 F.3d 906 · 2003
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Johnson v. Couturier (2009), Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan Bank (2006)
17 federal appellate · 13 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Salve Regina College v. Russell · McLinn F/v Fjord Johnson F/v Supersonic Churchill v. F/v Fjord F/v Supersonic F/v Supersonic · Hodgson v. Minnesota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“invests the district court with discretion as to the amount of security required, if any.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“invests the district court with discretion as to the amount of security required, if any. " Johnson v. Couturier , 572 F.3d 1067 , 1086 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Jorgensen v. Cassiday , 320 F.3d 906 , 919 (9th Cir. 2003) ) (internal quotation marks omitted and emphasis in original). The court "may dispense with the filing of a bond when it concludes there is no realistic likelihood of harm to the defendant from enjoining his or her conduct.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a party has been fully heard on an issue and there is no legally sufficient basis for a reasonable jury to find for that party on that issue.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.